With the exception of some blog posts, I edit all the copy that runs on Nonstop. Typically, my routine is to wake up at 5 a.m., log into our content management system and read the copy in our editorial queue.
It might be because of the early hour, but what I find myself often editing out are exclamation points. I do mull it over before I replace the exuberant exclamation point with the less exciting period. After all, the last thing I want to do is squash a writer’s passion. And I personally use the ! all the time in email. (Not doing so can seem a little rude or cold.) But with my long history in the newspaper biz, where exclamation points are typically stamped out, I can’t help but feel uncertain whenever the increasingly popular ! crops up in copy.
Is it overly emotional? Unnecessary? Even a little juvenile?
I wonder all these things, then typically find myself deleting a few of the !s I encounter. Generally, I leave them in blog posts. After all, these are people’s blogs, which are first person narratives. I feel perfectly entitled to correct spelling and grammar, but if someone feels like saying, “The food was great!” who am I to change it to “The food was great,” even though readers will get the idea both ways.
But for non-blog copy, which are typically gallery captions, I take more liberties to keep the tone consistent. For instance, in Melissa Chang’s Chopsticks & Wine gallery, I deleted a few exclamation points.
Here’s one example. The original sentence was: “The red wine peppercorn short ribs from Le Bistro were to die for!” I didn’t think it lost much to take the ! out. But I kept this next caption as is, because the ! added tone: “Detour: Some of my old-time Facebook friends. We stop and talk. I’m already out of sequence for the food!”
Anyway, I have no hard rules on the matter. Newspaper copy editors do have rules on why exclamation points are unnecessary, but in this new media age, where more personal journalism has come into vogue, old rules have become old fashioned. We want readers to feel our emotions and excitement. After all, how are they supposed to get excited about what we’re writing about if we keep a sullen, distant tone?
I’m curious what you think about exclamation points. You like seeing them? Do we use them too much? Too little? Do tell…
My recent blog posts
Melissa & Mari — our new food critiquing duo
Nonstop at 1 month: So how are we doing?
The best gift ever
Covering the ‘Hawaii Five-O’ premiere
We’ve got two new bloggers
What if people actually work together…
Why ‘Nonstop?’
A look behind Nonstop
Recent Posts:
- Truly must-see TV: ‘Family Ingredients’
- Night Market guide, part 2: Fashion & shopping
- Who’s coming: Eat the Street Bacon
- Did this: Taste of Marukai
- The Collection comes to Kaka’ako






unfortunately, i am an ignoramus who couldn't write a cogent english sentence if my life depended on it, and i'm a total scofflaw. see? i don't even capitalize, and i'm thinking of dropping whatever this thing (') is called from all contractions.
i blame Tom Wolfe for the flood of exclamation points into the writing of the general public. at a deeper level, i think it is also one of many little symptoms of the post literate age. if we all brushed up on our Vico and Mcluhan, we wouldnt worry so much about it. see, that? you hardly noticed the absence of that (') thing.
one thing i am atavistic about is paragraphs. i like them. i think they are useful. they are useful because they, like exclamation points and run-on sentences are a verbal, and verbal is what the post literate world is about.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like